Six Frequently asked questions about Nibiru (planet X) answered by NASA Scientist :
(1) I individual launch a lot of stuff some a so called planet. Follower x or nibiru. It anything they say practical equal revolving around the sun dextral and it has been said that its cavity is way far out previous Aidoneus. Also there are statements that it has a 3600 assemblage cavity around the sun an that is is supposed to take in the moral coming. Is this gettable at all?
(2)It sounds fishy to me, but there are questionable pics of it and a lot of soul tattle near it. I steady wikipedia searched it. I would meet equivalent to gain out few content individual images from a telescope of Nibiru. and people from the gray hemisphere can see Nibiru in the diurnal. is that control sufficiency for you?
(3) galore signs inform that something big is out there upcoming and why wouldn't it be real active nibiru / follower x there is a lot of fact past and scientific but i do see your awnser but why figure a scope at the southland pole an photos and much with this redish dwarf grapheme road abstinence in 1983 it was 50 cardinal miles off and 10 geezerhood afterwards it is alot fireman is it hiding behindhand the sun i cognise you all dont poorness to start a humans citywide anxiousness.
(4) I have were you said that Nibiru is a hoax. My cook the universe at help? (5) You say Nibiru is a deceive, and no such follower exists, but is Nibiru not Eris?
(6) What is this a representation of? protocol://www.greatdreams.com/nibiru-possible.jpg It's said to be Nibiru, but as you say Nibiru is a cozen. so what is this rattling a picture of?
Answer by NAI Senior Scientist David Morrison :
I hope this is my last comment on the Nibiru hoax, but questions like the above six keep coming in. Most of the entries on the Internet about Nibiru are false. Wikipedia has it correct when they write that "Nibiru is a name in Sumerian, Babylonian astrology associated with the god Marduk, generally accepted as referring to the planet Jupiter." The rest is a hoax, including all the "stuff" questioner #! found on the internet.
Questioners #2 and #3 mention the astronomical observatory at the South Pole, but I assure you these astronomers are not looking at Nibiru. The Antarctic is a great place for astronomical infrared and short-wave-radio observations, and it also has the advantage that objects can be observed continuously without the interference of the day-night cycle. If the questioner really thinks that Nibiru is visible in the daytime in the southern hemisphere, they are very confused; this sort of statement is obviously false.
Questioners #3 and #4 seem to think that the government would hide information about Nibiru and the catastrophe supposedly due in a few years, but I can't imagine why. My experience is, in fact, that sometimes parts of the government do just the opposite, as in the frequent references to various terrorist threats or warnings about driving accidents on long holiday weekends, which are no more dangerous than any other time. In any case, the job of NASA scientists is to discover and tell the truth!
Questioner (5) asks if Nibiru is the same as Eris, and the answer is an emphatic no. This Nibiru hoax has been around for a decade, including predictions that Nibiru would pass close to Earth and cause a catastrophe about 5 years ago. (Guess what: it didn't happen!). Eris, in contrast, is one of several dwarf planets recently found by astronomers in the outer part of out solar system, all of them on normal orbits that will never bring them close to Earth. There is a good write-up on Eris in Wikipedia.
Finally, Questioner (6) asks me to identify two pictures. I could perhaps do so if I knew the type of telescope and camera used and the scale of photos. Without that information, I can only guess that (if these photos are real) these might be images of a gas cloud (nebula) ejected by a star in its old age. They are obviously very distant, since we see stars in the foreground superposed on the nebula.
Also, since the stars are the same, this object (if it is real) has not moved between the dates of the two photos. It is just crazy that anyone would claim that these are photos of a planet in our own solar system. Let me say once again that Nibiru is a hoax promoted by a cult; it does not exist, and it certainly poses no threat to us. It saddens me that people would be taken in by such nonsense.
Credits to NASA
